Client story · Higher education

Best philanthropy year in 26 years, after the cabinet aligned on three priorities.

The University of Dallas cabinet was clear on its ideals and less clear on the few priorities that should drive everyday work. Two retreats and a year of follow-through later, three priorities lead every cabinet meeting and advancement had its best philanthropy year in 26 years.

Brittany Tipton facilitating the University of Dallas cabinet retreat
Organization
University of DallasCatholic liberal arts university
Location
Irving, Texas
Team
President's cabinet, then the next tier of leaders
Engagement
Two retreats a year apart, with monthly working sessions in between
The short version

Before, during and after.

3Shared priorities leading every cabinet agenda
26Years since advancement had a better philanthropy year
2Retreats, the second opened to the next tier of leaders
Before

“We were relatively clear on high ideals, but not clear enough on particular priorities and how those priorities really needed to be driven into the day-to-day work.”Dr. Jonathan J. Sanford

During

Mike and Brittany interviewed every cabinet member one on one, then built the retreat around what they heard. The cabinet left with three shared priorities and the measures to track them.

After

Most retreat plans never get executed. We kept UD's three priorities simple, clear and executable, and stayed in the work with the cabinet all year. Advancement had its best philanthropy year in 26 years.

01They're like us

A mission-driven school under pressure

The University of Dallas is a Catholic liberal arts university in Irving, Texas. Like schools across the country, it faces fewer students heading to college and the enrollment and revenue pressure that follows, while it protects what makes it distinctive.

The team was the President's cabinet, the senior leaders who run the university's biggest areas. The leader who brought us in was the President, Dr. Jonathan J. Sanford.

Sound familiar

  • A senior team clear on its values and less clear on the few priorities for this year
  • Leaders working in silos, with gaps between areas nobody owned
  • A strategic plan that had not yet turned into weekly action
02The problem

High ideals, blurry priorities

“We were relatively clear on high ideals, but not clear enough on particular priorities and how those priorities really needed to be driven into the day-to-day work.”
Dr. Jonathan J. SanfordPresident, University of Dallas

Sanford saw a cabinet that agreed on why the university exists and had a harder time agreeing on what to do first. Leaders worked in their own areas, the gaps between those areas went unaddressed, and some cabinet members found it hard to engage with each other.

The university had a strategic plan. Turning it into concrete action, with every leader pulling in the same direction, was the hard part.

What it was costing

“If we did not achieve this level of unification, we would just go through the next year haphazardly, doing the best we can, and I wonder if some people would lose hope all together of achieving our goals.”
Dr. Jonathan J. SanfordPresident, University of Dallas · On what was at stake
03Why Everest

Every leader heard first

Mike Fromhold and Brittany Tipton are former executives who led teams inside multi-billion-dollar companies. They start every engagement by talking with each leader alone, so the agenda comes from the team's own words.

An outside facilitator also changes what people are willing to say in the room. Ellis explained why a colleague leading the same conversation would get less out of it.

“It's because they don't have to give up any social capital.”
Ashton EllisSenior Vice President, University of Dallas · On why an outside facilitator matters
04What happened

Built from every leader's own words

  1. Discover

    Mike and Brittany interviewed every cabinet member one on one before setting a single agenda item. They brought back what they heard anonymously, so the team could see which concerns were widely shared.

  2. Connect

    The retreat opened with connection, so the team knew each other as people before it talked about goals.

  3. Align

    The team narrowed its goals to three priorities, wrote how it would reach them, and turned each into measures it could track week over week.

  4. Execute

    For the next year, monthly cabinet sessions went back to the priorities and the numbers behind them. Leaders had one-on-one coaching and help with board presentations and communication plans.

  5. Expand

    A year later, the second retreat started with senior leaders sharpening the goals, then brought in the next tier of leaders to test them and carry them into the rest of the university.

“Brittany and Mike actually knew what the problems were from behind the curtain, because they had talked to everyone individually.”
Matthias VorwerkProvost, University of Dallas
The University of Dallas cabinet at work in a bright retreat room
University of Dallas cabinet members in discussion around the table
Brittany Tipton coaching a small group at a round table
Mike Fromhold in conversation with a cabinet member during a break
The University of Dallas cabinet together on a staircase at their retreat
05What changed

Three priorities, every week

Culture changes in a chain. New experiences change what people believe, beliefs change how they behave, and behavior changes the results. Here is how that chain played out at UD.

  1. Experiences

    Every leader was interviewed alone, heard the team's shared concerns played back, told their own story in the room and wrote the priorities with their peers.

  2. Beliefs

    The cabinet came to see the three priorities as its own, since it wrote them together, and to see that the concerns each leader carried alone were shared across the table.

    “This time was extremely well spent because the team is focused on the work that needs to be accomplished and eager to achieve our goals together.”
    Dr. Jonathan J. SanfordPresident, University of Dallas
  3. Behaviors

    The three priorities became the first item on every cabinet agenda, with a dashboard in front of the team each meeting. Ellis described it as a weekly reset of the conversation around what everyone had agreed mattered most, which made it easier to point resources in the same direction. On the front line, admissions counselors noticed the most requested campus visit days were federal holidays, when parents are free. The university shifted counselors' days off so campus could open on those holidays.

  4. Results

    Advancement had its best philanthropy year in 26 years, in both unrestricted and restricted giving. More families were able to visit campus. New leaders joined a cabinet that already knew how to talk candidly and work across areas, and the second retreat carried the priorities to the next tier of leaders.

06What they’d tell a peer

Asked what he would tell another president whose team was fragmented:

“My response is going to be the same. Give Mike and Brittany a call.”

Dr. Jonathan J. SanfordPresident, University of Dallas

“Be a little more open and take an opportunity to let someone help and guide you.”
Matthias VorwerkProvost, University of Dallas · On what he would tell himself before the first retreat
More from University of Dallas

In their words.

See all results
“Mike and Brittany take a highly personalized approach, and I never felt like I was a customer.”
Dr. Jonathan J. SanfordPresident, University of Dallas
“Thank you guys for the work that you've done. It was really a wonderful experience, including the preparatory work and the individual interviews ahead of the retreat.”
Matthias VorwerkProvost, University of Dallas
“I was surprised at how impactful it was. I've read some business fables that are always nice but to be able to put things in order and I think it was helpful to have a third party be able to operate the conversation because you don't have quite the same dynamics you might have with a colleague or boss…I thought that was really effective.”
Ashton EllisSenior Vice President, University of Dallas
“You (Brittany) and Mike do a fantastic job and I recommend that people hire Everest Collective and get to work.”
Dr. Jonathan J. SanfordPresident, University of Dallas
Everest Discovery · 5 minutes

See where your team stands.

Ten questions across connection, clarity, alignment and execution. You’ll see your greatest opportunity at the end with no email required, then decide if a retreat makes sense.

Built from 40+ years of leading teams inside multi-billion-dollar companies.

Sample result
Execution is your greatest opportunity.
Overall 48 today · 74 ideal
Execution40 → 93
Alignment53 → 80
Clarity50 → 70
Connection50 → 60
TodayOpportunityIdeal